First,
click here to see Symantec’s (makers of Norton Internet
Security & Norton Antivirus) official verdict on the matter:
"Symantec Security Response encourages you to ignore any messages
regarding this hoax. It is harmless and is intended only to cause
unwarranted concern." And is therefore for all intense and purposes
effectively a spam virus in itself as it encourages millions of
emails to be sent all over the world
Now, let's look at the red flags that it's a hoax:
"This information arrived this morning, from Microsoft and
Norton."
Arrived where? When was this morning? Microsoft is not in the
anti-virus business and does not issue virus alerts. Norton is the
brand name of an antivirus program by Symantec
Corporation.
"Please send it to everybody you know who accesses the
Internet."
No antivirus company distributes information in this
fashion.
"You may receive an apparently harmless email with a PowerPoint
presentation called 'Life is beautiful.pps.'"
It is possible for a PowerPoint file to be infected with some types
of viruses, but this vulnerability is easily patched with updates
from Microsoft. Besides, what's keeping someone along the line from
changing the file name and sending it to you?
"If you receive it DO NOT OPEN THE FILE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES,
and delete it immediately."
Real virus warnings tell you about patches and software updates
that would provide real protection. They might also include
instruction for cleaning the infection and steps to take to report
the virus to the authorities. Deleting an infected attachment
doesn't protect you from future infections, nor would it remove any
existing infections.
"This is a new virus which started to circulate on Saturday
afternoon."
When was Saturday? Virtually every virus warning hoax is about a
"new" virus, even though some of them have been circulating for
years. This lends credence to the following mistaken assertion that
the antivirus wouldn't yet be on top of it.
"UOL has already confirmed its dangerousness, and the
antivirus Softs are not capable of destroying
it."
UOL is a Latin American e-mail provider and, as such, would be just
as unlikely an expert source on this as Microsoft. But, if so much
is known about this virus, why can't the antivirus programs detect
it and protect against it? In reality, most antivirus companies
issue updates within hours of a new virus being
detected.
The warning concludes with a description of the hacker's motives in
this attack, making it seem like you could be an innocent victim in
the war between big business and the little hacker - a common theme
in e-mail hoaxes.
Relying on anonymously authored and randomly forwarded e-mail
warnings to protect you and your PC from virus infection is akin to
hanging out in a hospital to protect yourself from the flu. It
doesn't provide any safeguards and, in fact, places you at
increased risk. There is no substitute for antivirus software. It's
(in real terms) inexpensive and readily available. Install it, keep
it updated and be vigilant and never forward another virus
warning.
Break the Chain.